Communications, Defined

Over steaks in Philly years ago, Frank Maguire gave me this three-part definition of "communication". I invoke it in nearly every engagement:

Communication = message sent, message received, message acted upon

We're all geniuses at "message sent" -- advertising, brochures, endless talking -- it's all literally a "broadcast" model of communications. Erect the tower, transmit the signal and send send send. And at the same time, if a tree falls in the woods, and nobody hears it...

You're confidently hitting "message received" most of the time? Good for you, you're measuring, paying attention, ensuring that the message reaches its destination. While you speak you also should absorb whether you are getting across. Stop, look, listen, just be sure you create a two-way street with the audience, however subtle or overt.

The true destination, though, is "message acted upon." Speaking and presenting is a results game. WHY are you speaking? WHAT do you need to achieve? Results, objectives, outcomes, goals are all the provenance of audience response. WHO do you need to affect, and most explicitly HOW do you need them to react?


Do you speak well? Good. Are you consistently heard? Better. Do you accomplish your objectives whenever you speak? Hurrah, email me to become a contributor to this blog :-)


If you think "objective" doesn't apply to your presentation, you're wrong. Objectives can be subtle, unexpected and indirect. They can be improvised, ad-hoc and changing on the fly. But ultimately, there's a REASON why you are up there (even if that reason is appease the audience until the main show can begin). You need to always focus on that reason.